Why Your Clients Keep Abandoning Your Course (And What To Build Instead)
Hey there!
I found a course that would have made me dramatically better at creating stunning videos. I closed the tab immediately.
It was 78 hours long.
For three techniques I needed. That math doesn’t work for anyone with a full-time job, a newsletter to run, and a family at home. The creator put everything they knew into one place and called it a course.
What I needed was 45 minutes on three things.
It existed in there. Buried under content I’d never use. This is what happens when the format comes before the outcome.
And it’s what your clients experience when you do the same thing to them.
Today I’m sharing the three questions that tell you what your clients actually need before you build anything, and the checklist test that might save you months of course production you don’t need to do.
Let’s walk through it.
Nobody questions the default
When coaches and consultants ask me how to monetize their expertise, almost everyone starts from the same place.
“I’m thinking about creating a course.”
That’s the assumed answer. The thing everyone in this space tells you to do.
I get why. A course feels like the right vehicle. You record your knowledge, package it up, and now you have something people can buy. It sounds like freedom.
But here’s what rarely gets questioned: whether a course is actually the right format for what you’re trying to help people do.
That question rarely gets asked. Coaches jump straight to planning the course before they’ve defined the outcome they’re after.
That’s the mistake. And I want to make a case for slowing down and asking a different question first.
Why more information is not more valuable
Too much information is a burden, not a gift.
When someone has to wade through hours of content before they can take a single action, that content becomes friction. They’re not learning. They’re translating. You’ve handed them raw material and asked them to do the work of converting it into something they can actually use.
Most people won’t do that work. Not because they’re lazy. Because it’s hard.
That video course was 78 hours of content. I needed three techniques from it. The creator assumed more content meant more value. It doesn’t. More content means more overhead for the person trying to learn.
Your job isn’t to share everything you know. Your job is to figure out what’s the MINIMUM a person needs in order to take the right actions and get a real result.
That’s a very different question.
The three questions to ask before you build anything
If you shouldn’t start with “what should I teach?”, where do you start?
I ask three questions, in this order.
OUTCOME. What do you want someone to be able to do when they’re done?
ACTION. What are the specific steps they need to take to get there?
OBSTACLES. What’s going to get in their way on those steps?
That’s the order. Outcome, then actions, then obstacles.
The order matters. Start with the outcome and you can work backward to the actions. If you know the actions, you can figure out what obstacles get in the way of each one. And THEN you can ask: what’s the minimum guidance someone would need to move past those obstacles and take those actions?
Not everything you know. Just the minimum.
That minimum is almost always smaller than you think.
Test the checklist before you build the course
Before you build anything, document your process.
Write down every step you take when you work with a client to get the result you’re known for. Get it on paper. Then turn it into a checklist.
Now put that checklist in front of a motivated person and see if they can follow it.
You might be surprised. I’ve seen cases where a well-built checklist was genuinely all someone needed. No videos. No modules. No explanations of the theory behind each step. Just: do this, then this, then this.
I learned this from my own experience. I had taken a course on a really powerful marketing method. It was solid. But when I started using it with my own clients, I realized most of the course wasn’t helping them take action.
What helped? When I distilled the whole thing into checklists and templates. I skipped most of the theory.
They implemented faster. They got results faster.
Did they need to understand the full system the way I had learned it? No. They needed to know what to DO. The checklist got them there.
So: document your process, build the checklist, test it. If a motivated person can follow it and get a result, you have something worth selling. Package it well so people understand its value. Don’t add hours of content to make it feel more legitimate.
You can always build more later. You can’t give people back the time they spent watching videos they didn’t need.
How to know when to add more, and what to add
Now, sometimes the checklist won’t be enough.
That’s okay. When it fails, it tells you EXACTLY what to add.
If someone gets to step three and gets stuck, you’ve just identified an obstacle. Now you know what to create. Not everything. Just enough to clear that specific sticking point.
Maybe it’s a short explanation. Maybe it’s another checklist for that one step. Maybe it’s a template they can fill in. The point is: you work up from minimum, not down from maximum.
This is how you build something people can actually finish. Something they’ll remember getting a real result from. Something they’ll tell other people about.
The goal was never to create a lot of content. The goal was to help someone do something they couldn’t do before.
Keep asking: what’s the minimum intervention that would make that happen?
That question will serve you better than any course outline ever could.
That video course creator spent months on something I dismissed in under a minute.
They built for thoroughness instead of outcome. Your clients are making the same call every time they open something you’ve built and decide it’s too much.
Start with the three questions. Find the minimum. Test it before you build anything bigger.
What you create might be smaller than you planned. And it’ll actually get used.
Rodney
Want a repeatable method for building focused courses?
If you’re going to build a course, or a checklist, or anything in between, you want a system that helps you start from the result and work backward to what actually needs to be taught.
That’s exactly what the Atomic Course Blueprint is built around. It’s 33 pages. No fluff. A repeatable method for creating focused, results-driven courses without the usual overwhelm.
And it comes with a 60-day Smiley Guarantee. If it’s not useful, you get your money back.
Check out the Atomic Course Blueprint here.
Have questions? Just reply to this email. I read every one.


It's tough to do this right because if it's a focused course, it feels like it's "not enough content" to justify, say, $200.
However, as your story shows, customers WANT "less" if that "less" solves their problem and is easy enough to consume and implement.
A real-life example:
You don't pay a tax accountant in March to give you a full education on the tax code. You pay them a few hundred dollars to fill out your tax return. I don't want the "extra value" to make it worth it. The service I sought out is more than plenty.
Very well put! I used to give the new guy the instruction page and let him work through it without my guidance. When he or she struggled with a step, it was time to revise. Instructions should not just be a picture but, as you point out, something that actually accomplishes the task in the least amount of instruction